Medical Device Submissions Workshops – Premarket Approval (PMA)
8:30 am – 4:30 pm ET
February 6-7, 2025
Gain exclusive access to FDA and industry experts who will guide you through the critical medical device submissions process step-by-step during this hybrid workshop!
Medical Device Submissions Workshops – Premarket Approval (PMA)
8:30 am – 4:30 pm ET
February 6-7, 2025
Medical Device Submissions Workshops – Premarket Approval (PMA)
8:30 am – 4:30 pm ET
February 6-7, 2025
Registration is open for the Medical Device Submissions Workshop: Premarket Approval (PMA) happening February 6-7, 2025! This workshop will connect attendees with FDA representatives and seasoned industry experts to breakdown the PMA application process. You’ll gain insights on aligning with FDA expectations, structuring effective submissions, and reducing the risk of delays or rejections—ensuring a smoother path to market for your technologies.
Using real-world case studies, this workshop will walk attendees through the practical steps of filing a PMA and provide actionable insights on how to best navigate the PMA submission process, best practices, common pitfalls, and more! Take advantage of this chance to connect with other medtech professionals to foster partnerships and provide support for future regulatory challenges. Secure your spot for the two-day PMA Workshop!
Who should attend?
These workshops are valuable for anyone aiming to streamline the regulatory process, reduce submission risks, and confidently bring their device to market such as:
- Medical device professionals new to the FDA regulatory submission process
- Regulatory Affairs Professionals
- Regulatory Compliance Professionals
- Quality Assurance Professionals
- Regulatory Affairs Rotational Associates
View the preliminary 2025 PMA agenda below or download it here.
Join the mailing list to receive the latest news and updates on the 2025 Workshops.
PMA Submissions Workshop
Day One
*Schedule reflects Eastern Time
Time | Session Name |
---|---|
8:30 – 9:00 am | Registration Check-In and Continental Breakfast |
9:00 – 9:05 am | Welcome and Introductions |
9:05 – 10:00 am | Beginning at the Beginning Elaine Tseng, Counsel, King & Spaulding When is a De Novo or PMA required – PMA: what to expect – What are the standards of evidence – What are the standards of review – Will submission go to panel – How much will it cost – How long will it take to get approval |
10:00 – 10:45 am | Development of a PMA Submission Strategy Nam To, Policy Analyst, FDA – Product definition – Development of testing requirements and strategy – Desired patient population – Desired claims – Early interactions with FDA – Planning for product iterations |
10:45 – 11:00 am | Break |
11:00 – 12:00 pm | Mechanics of PMA Quality System Submission Development and Review Jhumur Banik, PMA Policy Analyst, HDE, Q-Submission and Device Tracking Lifecyle (PHQ) Team, Division of Submission Support (DRP1), Office of Regulatory Programs (ORP), CDRH, FDA – Defining data requirements – Required elements – Presentation of information with clarity – Expectations during review – Best practices – Manufacturing & Quality Systems – Case for Quality |
12:00 – 1:00 pm | Networking Lunch |
1:00 – 2:00 pm | During Submission Review Jennifer Bolton, Senior Fellow, Regulatory Affairs, Boston Scientific – Interactions with the FDA – When/How to expect questions – Types of letters – Timelines – Day 100 meetings – Labeling review |
2:00 – 3:00 pm | Conditions of Approval Studies Jennifer Bolton, Senior Fellow, Regulatory Affairs, Boston Scientific – Criteria and objectives – Early collaboration with FDA – Reaching agreement – Reporting outcomes – 522 Studies |
3:00 – 3:15 pm | Break |
3:15 – 4:15 pm | Preparation for Advisory Panels Jessica Ringel, Partner, King & Spalding – When? – Who are the panel members? – Why have a panel meeting? – Preparation for a panel meeting – What to expect before, during, and after – Best practices |
Day Two
Time | Session Name |
---|---|
8:30 – 9:00 am | Continental Breakfast |
9:00 – 10:00 am | Inspection Activity Jacob Dyer, Senior Regulatory Officer, FDA – Pre-approval inspections – How to prepare for an inspection |
10:00 – 11:00 am | Dealing with the Unexpected Tony Blank, Senior Director of Regulatory Affair, AtriCure – Clinical outcomes – Animal test results – Adverse panel recommendation |
11:00 – 11:15 am | Break |
11:15 am – 12:30 pm | The Care and Feeding of Approved PMAs Monica Montanez, Principal Strategy Consultant, NAMSA – Periodic (“Annual”) Reports – Supplemental Submissions – 30-day notices |
12:30 – 1:30 pm | Networking Lunch |
1:30 – 2:15 pm | CDRH Ombudsman’s Office Ken Skodacek, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Deputy Ombudsman, FDA – Roles & Responsibilities – The Appeals Process |
2:15 – 2:30 pm | Break |
2:30 – 4:30 pm | Applied Learning and Breakout Discussions Tony Blank, Senior Director of Regulatory Affair, AtriCure *In person participants, only – PMA Recap – Facilitated Breakout Group Deep Dive – Hypothetical Case Studies – Key Takeaways – Regroup for Final Program Q&A |
4:30 pm | Adjournment |
Join medical device submissions experts and FDA officials who will provide essential guidance through the PMA submission process
Meet the Speakers
Jhumur Banik, PMA Policy Analyst, HDE, Q-Submission and Device Tracking Lifecyle (PHQ) Team, Division of Submission Support (DRP1), Office of Regulatory Programs (ORP), CDRH, FDA
Jhumur Banik, MS, PMP is a Policy Analyst with the PMA, HDE, Q-Submission and Device Tracking Lifecyle (PHQ) Team in the Division of Submission Support (DRP1), Office of Regulatory Programs (ORP) in FDA/CDRH. She is involved in policy development and providing her regulatory and technical expertise on PMAs, PMA GMP, and Q-submissions for internal and external stakeholders among various other duties. Previously, she was a Lead Reviewer/Biomedical Engineer with Office of Health Technology 2 where she conducted numerous lead and consulting reviews while also contributing to the standards and guidance development efforts in the cardiovascular devices space. Before joining FDA, she worked in Regulatory Affairs for medical device manufacturers. She received her BS and MS degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in NY.
Tony Blank, Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs, AtriCure
Tony Blank is the Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs at AtriCure. He is formerly the cofounder of Barton & Blank, a regulatory consulting firm specializing in providing strategic and tactical regulatory support for medical devices and combination products. Previously, Blank spent 12 years at Boston Scientific Corp. Under his leadership of the cardiovascular regulatory teams, Boston Scientific obtained numerous regulatory approvals for cardiovascular medical devices and combination products—among these being worldwide regulatory approvals for drug-eluting stents, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D), cardiac pacemakers and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P), and detachable coils for peripheral embolization. Blank has been an active representative for the medical device industry and the regulatory profession on numerous policy issues working with AdvaMed. Among these activities has been participation in numerous Industry Working Groups including the Pediatric Devices, Advertising and Promotion, and Reprocessing Working Groups (each of which he co-chaired).
Jennifer Bolton, Senior Fellow, Regulatory Affairs, Boston Scientific
Jennifer Bolton is a Senior Fellow, Regulatory Affairs, at Boston Scientific Corporation. Boston Scientific is dedicated to transforming lives through innovative medical solutions that improve the health of patients around the world, specifically with less-invasive technologies engineered to diagnose and treat a wide range of medical conditions.
Jennifer has 30 years’ Regulatory experience. She’s led key market and clinical approvals for many cardiovascular and peripheral products including the ACURATE neo2 Aortic Valve System and the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device. She also works with integration projects, combination product projects, serves on the MDIC ENRICHMENT Industry Advisory Council, volunteers with a local Medtech Accelerator for early-stage start-ups, and is an Adjunct Instructor for the St. Cloud State University Regulatory Affairs and Services master’s program.
Jacob Dyer, Senior Regulatory Officer, FDA
LCDR Jake Dyer serves as a Senior Regulatory Officer within the Regulatory Inspections and Audits Team at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Regulatory Programs. In his current role as a Program Analyst and Assessor for the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP), he leads initiatives focused on the program’s development and implementation in collaboration with international regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders.
With over eight years of experience at the FDA, Jake began his tenure as a Medical Device Investigator. He is a licensed Professional Engineer and holds multiple certifications, including Lean Design for Six Sigma Black Belt, Project Management Professional (PMP), Certified Quality Auditor, and Level 2 FDA Medical Device Investigator. LCDR Dyer earned a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Science in Data Science.
Monica Montanez, MS, RAC, CQA, Principle Strategy Consultant – Regulatory, NAMSA
Monica Montanez has over 25 years of experience in the medical device industry working with a broad range of medical device technologies and organizations from start-ups to multinationals.
Monica began her medical device career with Millar Instruments and then with Cyberonics (now Liva Nova), CONMED, Generic Medical Devices, Inc, Cochlear and before joining Medtronic in 2010. With NAMSA, Monica then moved into consultancy where the focus of her work has always been working with manufacturers with complex submissions for novel devices. She is the in-house expert for regulatory software as a medical device and artificial Intelligence, machine learning. Monica also holds a Master’s of Science in Regulatory Science from the School of Pharmacy University of Southern California.
Jessica Ringel, Partner, FDA and Life Sciences, King & Spalding
Jessica Ringel advises medical device and other life sciences manufacturers and distributors on matters spanning the entire FDA regulatory lifecycle. She advises clients on premarket regulatory strategy by assessing pathways to market, identifying predicate devices for 510(k) submissions, preparing q-submissions to receive FDA feedback, and assisting clients with the preparation and submission of marketing applications, including 510(k)s, De Novos, and PMAs. After clearance or approval of a device, Jessica advises clients on the full range of post-market compliance matters. She assists firms in preparing for and managing FDA inspections, responding to FDA-483s and Warning Letters, and implementing quality system corrective actions and remediation plans. Jessica also advises clients on product recall strategy and communications and adverse event reporting obligations.
Jessica has also worked with multiple clients on the negotiation of, and operations under, consent decrees of injunction with FDA. She further assists life sciences firms with the review and development of compliant marketing strategies and materials. She assists clients with FDA-related import matters, including by responding to import detentions to obtain the release of products held by FDA.
Ken Skodacek, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Deputy Ombudsman, FDA
Ken Skodacek has been working with medical devices for over 30 years and serves as the Deputy Ombudsman for FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). In this role, Ken provides a confidential, independent, and impartial resource that informally investigates complaints and resolves disputes. He typically prevents and resolves misunderstandings through candid conversations and facilitated meetings with external stakeholders and FDA staff. The CDRH Ombudsman Program also ensures fair and efficient processing of appeals of CDRH decisions. Outside of his responsibilities at FDA, he has served as the Co-Chair of the American Bar Association’s Ombuds Committee and is an active member of the Coalition of Federal Ombudsman and the United States Ombudsman Association.
He previously served in the Center’s Clinical Trials Program, where he led the development and implementation of policies and programs intended to improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) submission and review process.
Elaine Tseng, Counsel, King & Spalding
Elaine Tseng focuses on regulatory matters in the area of life sciences. A partner in our FDA and Life Sciences practice, Elaine represents medical device, pharmaceutical and other life sciences sector clients in a variety of regulatory strategy, approval, marketing, compliance and enforcement matters.
Elaine primarily represents clients in matters involving the Food and Drug Administration. She provides proactive regulatory strategy and compliance counseling, including in the areas of FDA marketing clearance/approval and exemptions, clinical studies and product development, adverse event reporting, recalls, and other pre- and post-market compliance obligations. Elaine advises on managing FDA inspections, responding to FDA-483s and warning letters, interacting with FDA on compliance and product review matters, pursuing regulatory appeals and petitions and participating in FDA Advisory Committee deliberations. Elaine has extensive experience conducting FDA regulatory due diligence assessments in connection with corporate transactions, handling internal investigations involving FDA issues, and conducting audits and assessments of compliance with FDA requirements regarding quality systems/cGMP, clinical trials, and marketing and promotion. She also advises companies on structuring business transactions and ventures to minimize regulatory risk and potential compliance concerns.
Attendees joining us in person will come to AdvaMed’s office located at 1301 Pennsylvania Ave NW Suite #400, Washington, D.C. 20004.
This event is offered both virtually and in-person to maximize convenience. Please note that in-person and virtual pricing is the same.
Check to see if your company is an AdvaMed member here.
- AdvaMed Member: $1,600
- AdvaMed Accel Member: $850
- Non-Members: $2,100
- Government/Academic/Nonprofit: $850
Learn more about the other Medical Device Submissions Workshops focused on the 510(k) and De Novo and Investigational Device Exemption process.
510(k) and De Novo Submissions Workshop
February 3-4, 2024
Gain strategies for assembling and streamlining effective 510(k) and De Novo submissions and obtain insight into FDA’s perspective on the 510(k) and De Novo review process during this interactive two-day workshop. This workshop will cover:
- FDA guidance for 510(k)
- Different types of 510(k)s
- Tips on interacting with FDA during the 510(k) review process
- De Novo overview and strategy
IDE Submissions Workshop
February 7, 2024
FDA and industry experts will share the guidelines governing when an investigational device exemption is required. Experts will review the purpose of an IDE, share tips for making the best use of pre-submission meetings, break down the components of an IDE submission and more. This workshop will cover:
- The purpose of an IDE
- Components of a successful IDE submission
- Common errors and deficiencies in an IDE application
- Optimizing the pre-submission meeting
Hear From Us
Sign up to receive emails highlighting our upcoming events, early registration savings, and engagement opportunities for the medical technology community.